Tuesday, November 24, 2009

汤圆糖水

突然心血来潮,想吃汤圆。 向来潮湿闷热的天气最近转凉了,尤其是刚下过雨的黄昏。真想来一碗热腾腾的甜姜汤暖暖胃。小时候在香港,总能在奶奶家吃到很香的汤圆加糖水。糖水的味道有点像番薯糖水,在金黄色的甜蜜中带有淡淡的姜辣。它含蓄地衬托着粘粘滑滑的糯米汤圆,其表露的情感是含蓄而温暖的。再冷的冬夜,也有这碗亲情御寒。

来到这里,我甚少吃到这种汤圆的煮法。外面卖的通常都是伴着厚厚的花生汤、芝麻糊,即粗糙又浮夸。现在想重温童年的冬天,干脆凭味觉的记忆自己煮一回。才发现,原来一点都不难。(对我这个烹饪低手,煮糖水可是我的第一次!

材料:
两包汤圆 (芝麻和花生陷,各十粒)
两片片糖 (找遍金文泰才找到一家药店有卖!)
--》这里有片糖的照片和介绍: http://bbs.zdface.com/showtopic-185275.aspx
一小块老姜
几片班兰叶 (Pandan leaf)


老姜切小片。班兰叶要洗干净,因为叶子中间通常藏有很多泥沙。




大概三份一锅的水(没量清楚),再加入姜片和班兰叶,煮致沸腾。然后慢火加入两片片糖。糖都融化了,便可把汤圆放进汤。待糖水再滚,汤圆都浮上来便可关火。



第一次煮汤圆糖水,成功!

填饱肚子之余,心也被送回香港的奶奶家里。味道,始终还是家的温暖。

Monday, November 16, 2009

study week and 2012

This was my table last wednesday, the day before I handed in my last essay for the sem. Its freaking 3500 words long! But I'm happy about it. This sem I chose assignment topics based on my interest more than anything else, and even though I'll still feel the angst, feel that mental rut, feel that I'm running out of time, get lesser than expected results (for one essay), get more than expected results (for another essay), but I'll still be glad I went through that process. Now study week is here, but somehow I'm not that stressed, maybe not yet. haha. I'm really just taking it easy. Hopefully it is because I can handle stress much better now, and not because I care less about studying! haha. But one thing's for sure in this sem, I really enjoy school! And everything I'm learning.

I watched 2012 last thursday. I thought it was an amazing movie, and its not only the effects that are amazing. There were so many moral lessons to be learnt from there. *spoiler alert!* The most fundamental question that I walked away with was, What does it mean to be human? What does humanity, or human civilization really stands for? And there are also other very poignant scenarios, that those who survives ultimately are those elites, and how the powerful can withhold information 'for the sake of the people' but eventually depriving them a chance to survive. Even though the human race is resilient enough to save part of humanity, how does one wants the children to read about the history of mankind? That the new civilization began with selectively determining who survives and killing everyone else in the world? Moreover, this kinda stellar (or solar in our case) radiation outbursts are probably commonplace in the whole universe, yet we experience it as an apocalypse, and scrambles to keep ourselves alive. Our civilization, no matter how powerful, or intelligent or adaptable, are merely a infinitesimal speck in the whole comic evolution. How humbling is that. No other movie has made me think about such broad issues before, not even other disaster movies that also speculate the end of the world. Weiliang wasn't as impressed as me though, although he also agrees with the moral lessons. So I strongly recommend this movie!

More than one friend has told me that The Day After Tomorrow is nicer, or that 2012 is really boring etc. So I went to buy the dvd for TDAT and watch if for myself. The director is actually the same - Roland Emmerich, who also directed Independence Day. I would think that 2012 is still better than TDAT, because the former really struck a moral and emotional chord, while the latter doesn't provoke my thoughts in the same way. Also 2012 has a more global, pan-humanity perspective (though still US-centric), whereas the latter is really confined to the US. I also liked 2012 because I found its scientific reasoning to be more convincing than TDAT. But of course, WL was right that solar radiation would also cook the people on the ground, and not just the lava below earth's crust. But still it is more convincing than the rapid change of thermal currents, which usually doesn't happen such rapidly, and even it if does it should already be predicted by the desalination in the sea. Alright I have not much scientific knowledge under my belt too, but perhaps taking Understanding the Universe does aid me in better understanding 2012. Haha. Gems are quite useful after all.

Interestingly, there are some parallels in both films:
1. Both films start off with the main scientist delivering or discovering a scientific issue in New Delhi.
2. The main lead in TDAT and one of the main leads in 2012 are scientists, signally the faith in science to explain or resolve problems.
3. Both the main scientists encountered initial resistance from someone in the bureaucracy to deliver their message.
4. Both lead characters have a divorced family and have issues with keeping up with promises to the son.
5. The first city that gets struck is LA. Washington seems always to be quite safe in the initial stages of the disaster.
6. Both presidents are depicted as noble, wise and visionary. And they both died in the disaster. The 'bad guy' in the government are always the second man or someone down the line.

Nonetheless, in terms of cinematic flow and maturity of script I do think that Emmerich has grown from TDAT to 2012. Alright. enough of reviewing 2012 and TDAT. hah.

Wednesday, November 11, 2009

Shout-outs

I'm doing my essay on May Fourth Women Writers now. Gosh. I'm beginning to think that maybe I should have majored in literature instead of history, especially Chinese modern literature. Mr Ng How Wee, Mrs Tan Siew Lan from NYJC, and Dr Xu Lanjun had definitely inspired me much in this area. =) Hope to take some Chinese women's literature mods in Zhejiang next year.

I seem to be suddenly deprived of public attention. Ha. Had been posting more shout-outs on Facebook and Twitter in the last 12 hours than I ever did in the entire last month.

Oh, this is something I shouted out but I still wanna record here.

I'm damn amazed at how freely my brother can just travel! He flew to KL and came back all within the last 24 hours, and all for the fun of it. And I didn't even noticed that he's gone la. Air tickets to him are as cheap as bus tickets I suppose. Shudders.

Sunday, November 8, 2009

Essay writing

Why does every essay has to be such a laborious and tedious creation?

I'm still stuck with the intro and with sorting out the confusing, meddling strands of thoughts in my head. Everything seems so very very tightly entangled.

When will my ideological cloth be weaved?